adiva_calandia: (Are you -- Nobody -- Too?)
adiva_calandia ([personal profile] adiva_calandia) wrote2010-07-10 07:00 pm

(no subject)

F-list, solve my life for me.

Are Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass fairy tales?

Important question is important! Seriously!
batyatoon: (Default)

[personal profile] batyatoon 2010-07-11 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
(Well, if your academic article is about fairytales, you should end that with "but it's really a BABY SWAN".)

I don't know if I agree that fairytales are unattributed, is the thing. But there's no real way to determine whether or not that's part of the definition, except by declaring it so (or not).

[identity profile] beyondthesunset.livejournal.com 2010-07-12 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
LOLing at the baby swan.

I don't think attribution or the lack thereof is as important in this context as structure. It is certainly a part of our common definition, but as you pointed out, there are modern stories that are definitely fairy-tale like. We may have to draw a distinction between folklore/folktale and fairy tale. They often overlap, but one is not always both. Then there are other archetypal stories; they may fit into Jung's collective unconsciousness, but I don't think of them as fairy tales.

The cause-and-effect structure you mentioned might be a good working definition; you can flesh it out as you go.